Tag Archive for theater shooting

Who Needs an Assault Rifle?

AR-15s are versatile rifles.  Do you have an Assault Rifle?  Do you have an AR-15?  Why did you decide to get such a firearm?  I know some people get them because of availability of parts, you can swap out the uppers, lowers, etc.  They are easy to transport.  They have so many accessories and can be adapted for nearly any use. This AR-15 (in the photo) was purchased to enter 3-gun competitions.  If you have not heard about 3-gun, I will tell you about that one of these days.  This rifle is set up as a semi-auto, it does have a 30 round mag, which is legal in Indiana.  If I had an AR-15 in California, the way I understand it is that it is only legal if it is a “top load” only, with a permanent 10 round mag attached.  I won’t bother, that is too much trouble.  In the photo above, we were shooting about 100-300 yards at a farm.  It is a hoot to shoot. It is only evil when used by an evil man.

UPDATE:  The reason I wrote this article and titled it the way I did was tainted with just a little sarcasm.  That sarcasm was perhaps a little too subtle and geared directly at the media.  They keep saying the shooter in the Aurora theater had an “Assault Rifle.”  He actually had an AR-15, and yes, it was still semi-auto.  I hear the news anchors ask each other “Why does anyone need an assault rifle?” “These are weapons used only by terrorists.” No, an AR-15 is not necessarily an assault rifle, and I am not a terrorist, I am a normal girl who loves her country and fellow man.  I have used an AR-15 several times, and I loved every minute of it.

Governor Hickenlooper: Common Sense Talk About Gun Control

The tragedy in Colorado has seen it’s share of knee-jerk gun control comments by journalists reading teleprompters and saying whatever their network wants them to say.  There have also been a few politicians who are using this platform to nudge folks their way.  I saw an interview with Colorado Governor Hickenlooper today on MSNBC and was impressed by his direct decision NOT to blame guns in this massacre, but rather the mental illness or other evil we find resident in our society.  When asked directly about gun control discussions he said, “I think that debate’s going to happen. It already has started, but you look at this person, again, almost a creature. I mean if he couldn’t have gotten access to the guns, what kind of bomb would he have manufactured?”

Given the fact that it is usually democrats that vie to increase gun control, I was very surprised by his statement.  I try to go easy on the politics on this blog overall, and I know many, many democrats that are staunch supporters of the 2nd Amendment.  Still, from a democratic politician, this was refreshing.

Then, later in the evening, during the memorial, he made another comment I fully support.  He said, “I refuse to say his name, In my house, we’re just going to call him Suspect A.”  This is a simple decision that I wish all of the world could agree to. Let’s not make this man a celebrity, let’s call him suspect A, let’s avoid showing his pictures.  Let’s erase him and give him no fame.  He is nothing. Let’s instead celebrate the lives of those cut short.

The Wall Street Journal suggested, “rather than head off again into the political cul-de-sac of gun control, we instead debate one of the implications of Mr. Hickenlooper’s observation: How society can better detect and treat mental illness.”  This is brilliant.  People who are against responsible gun ownership are at their best actually again gun crimes, and at their worst against a nation’s people retaining force comparable to the government. (Which is why we have the 2nd Amendment, to protect us from a tyrannical government.)  For those actually only against “gun crime”, if they spent the funds trying to discover and cure mental illness that they do fighting the NRA and other 2nd Amendment supporters, maybe spree shootings could be thwarted more often.

I am not sure we will find the answers we are looking for, but I do think that the Governor of my state is doing good work leading through this nightmare.

 

UK Telegraph: Glock Weapon of Choice for Spree Killers – Seriously?

The UK Telegraph published an article yesterday making a very large generalization that the “Glock pistol has been the weapon of choice for spree killers.”  This is a ridiculous statement.  The killer in Aurora, CO apparently did have a Glock 40 in his possession and another in his car.  The killer in Norway did use a Glock 17 for some of the murders he committed as well.  You can read their article and look at the laundry list of mass murderers and the weapons they used.  Still, this is ridiculous.  Could you say, “Pepsi” is the soda of choice for spree killers? Could you say spree killers all own Levi Jeans?  Glocks are an extremely  popular, and reliable weapon brand.  To make such a generalization is only meant to harm a Corporation and to push an anti-gun agenda.