Archive for Politics

Separate Mental Illness Solutions from Firearms Politics and We Might Get Somewhere

Screen Shot 2013-06-09 at 11.48.54 PMI read an opinion piece on a Salt Lake News site. If it was biased in one direction or the other, the author was subtle enough to allow an open minded discussion. It caught my interest, because I can see this really is the only answer. There are so many acts of violence, and too often inexplicable shooting rampages like the one in Santa Monica. While I have been waiting for them to identify the shooter, I had no doubt that when they did, some history of mental illness would be found. In every single mass shooting, the shooter has had serious mental problems, and most have been on SSRI medication as well. We will see if that is true of this Santa Monica shooter in the days to come.

The politicians decide the answer to this is to impose serious regulation upon all of society. If they would spend as much time, energy, and funding trying to fix the mental care health system – ensuring that those who need help have access to help, they might actually impact the violence.

This opinion piece said basically said, as long as the two issues, mental illness and gun violence are entwined, there will never be a solution for either.  They must be dealt with independently – only then is there a chance for change. What do you think?

Read more here:  In our opinion: Keep the issues of gun violence and untreated mental illness separate.

Taya Kyle (Chris’ widow) Sticks to Her Guns on 2nd Amendment

Taya and Chris Kyle

Taya and Chris Kyle

“A gun didn’t kill my husband, a man killed my husband,” Taya Kyle, 38, told The New York Post. Chris Kyle — credited with 160 confirmed kills during his 10-year career as a Navy SEAL was shot in February at a Glen Rose, Texas, gun range after ex-Marine Eddie Ray Routh allegedly blasted him and another man at close range, killing both.  The mother of two has steadfastly defended the rights of gun owners. She recently rallied gun enthusiasts at an NRA convention in Houston to continue to defend the Second Amendment, said she owns a Smith & Wesson pistol and even aims to take up hunting soon.  “Unfortunately, it’s a hot issue and people like to make it into a bigger picture that’s not an accurate picture,” she explained. “The majority of ways guns are used every day are very positive. Her husband wrote the bestselling memoir “American Sniper” and was penning a new book, “American Gun: A History of the U.S. in Ten Firearms,” at the time of his death. It will be released June 4. He was so lethal he had an $80,000 bounty placed on his head by insurgents in Iraq and was nicknamed “Al-Shaitan Ramad” — “The Devil of Ramadi.”

His past is never far from his wife’s mind.

“For somebody like me, who can feel vulnerable, it is nice to have an added element of protection because there are people who are motivated to do evil,” she said. “That’s not going to change. If you’re going to do evil, you are going to do it — and . . . I’d like to be able to protect myself.”

Her husband’s alleged killer, Routh, 25, was reportedly suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and Kyle was trying to help him through it. Taya doesn’t buy that Routh was suffering PTSD.

“People who have PTSD don’t talk about it. They don’t use it as an excuse. They carry guns and they do good work and love their families,” she said. “They struggle, but it doesn’t change their character.”

She said Routh’s upcoming trial would shed light on the alleged killer’s motives, but declined to discuss how. “Chris has a lot of experience with guys with PTSD — hunting, shooting and healing. For that reason alone, there was no reason not to take him to the range — there’s a lot more information Chris would have needed to not to make that decision.”

Taya said she’ll be promoting the book in her husband’s place. And the spotlight will soon grow even brighter. Steven Spielberg will be directing a movie based on “American Gun,” and Bradley Cooper will be playing Kyle — an actor he approved, Taya said.  Read the original article here.

A 15 Year old girl standing up for the 2nd Amendment!

Watch this video – a very well spoken 15 year old young lady takes time to support the 2nd amendment.  Thank you to my friend over at “The Mellow Jihadi” for sending this one my way!

Democrats are shaking in their boots over Bloomberg’s Gun Control Ads

I am not sure how this country has become so partisan, the positive gun culture has been woven into the fabric of our nation, from the earliest colonial days. Certainly our nation has changed, grown, adapted as time has passed, but our love of guns and the passion for the 2nd Amendment is something that surpasses political lines. This fact is what concerns me the most about an article I read on Politico this morning:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s aides met recently with staffers of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to warn them: Targeting vulnerable Democrats like Arkansas’s Mark Pryor on gun control could backfire on the party, according to POLITICO. Apparently, Bloomberg did not listen. Ads from the Bloomberg-funded Mayors Against Illegal Guns are going up soon in Alaska, Arkansas and North Dakota — three states with Democratic senators who broke with the White House on last month’s background checks vote.  It’s all got Democrats nervous about keeping their hold on the Senate, if they are under attack from not only Republicans but pro-gun control forces as well.

Bloomberg’s group has made its choice: Its radio spots in Arkansas will target the state’s African-American community, “without which Mark Pryor doesn’t have a prayer of getting reelected,” said Mark Glaze, director of Mayors Against Illegal Guns. Four Senate Democrats — Pryor, Max Baucus of Montana, Mark Begich of Alaska and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota — joined with Republicans to derail the bill, drawing howls of protest from the gun control movement and complaints from the White House. But it’s Pryor’s fate that has Democratic leadership most worried.

Senate Democrats point to the example of former Arkansas Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln as a warning. Labor unions, angered by Lincoln’s vote against legislation they backed, helped fund a primary challenger in 2010. Lincoln narrowly won that primary, and then was swamped that November by Republican John Boozman. Democratic senators and aides also note that Pryor has backed President Barack Obama and the leadership on other big issues such as Obamacare, banking reform and taxes, and Reid will need him on upcoming immigration votes.  

I have seen both sides of the aisle hold their ground so firmly even to their detriment. I do not understand why the Democratic party is willing to spend so much political capital on this issue and these laws when they have so many other items they would like to accomplish on their agenda. Why they are so set on these Bills when it is obvious they are “feel good laws” at best, tyranny at the worst, and will do nothing to stop evil with intent on harming others.

Why would they take on their own party’s Senators when their hold on Congress is not as strong as they desire?  They admit that Senator Pryor has supported many other major items on the Obama agenda, but Sen. Pryor felt like he was voting the way his constituents would want him to vote.  If every member of congress had done so – we would not even be having this conversation. For example, if the Senators in Colorado had made their votes based on the wishes of the people of Colorado, the mail, the e-mails, the phone calls, they would not have voted for this Bill either. In our Representative Republic, we the people elected the individuals who we most trusted would govern in a way aligned with our values.  I am sure the people of Arkansas made the decision to vote for Sen. Pryor because they feel he represents their interests.

I think that’s one thing the American people are frustrated about, these purity tests. Quite honestly, I’m here to represent Arkansas. I think people on all sides, in all parties and all groups, they need to go back to civics class and maybe read the Constitution and realize we’re here to represent our states and the people who sent us to Washington. 

~Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR)

There is something very disturbing about one Billionaire, from one state, messing with the political will of the people in another state.  It is time we take our country back.

NRA Women – This is OUR Time!

Screen Shot 2013-05-03 at 8.12.29 PM

This video titled “New Energy” is one of the most powerful, beautiful, and explanatory pieces of work I have seen representing women who celebrate the 2nd Amendment.  I am a female gun enthusiast, and see myself in this video.  This is who I am. This is who most gun owners are.  If you have not yet seen it, take a few minutes and share it with some one who is not too sure – maybe it will help them understand.

I am going to do EXACTLY what you said Mr. President!

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 8.52.48 PM

Today President Obama responded to the defeat of the Toomey-Manchin Bill. He was quite emotional, angry, and showered veiled threats on the Democrats who chose to side with the Constitution. He was surrounded by Sandy Hook parents and Gabby Giffords. Watch the video below of President Obama, and then let’s discuss some of the points he makes in the video:

President Obama: A few moments ago a minority in the United States Senate decided it just wasn’t worth it. They blocked common sense gun reforms.

Lil Chantilly: If the Senate had the required 60 votes they would have passed. You are an Ivy League educated scholar Mr. President, surely you know that it only required 41 votes to shoot down these amendments. There is a reason our system is set up as it is.

President Obama: It wouldn’t have prevented future massacres.

Lil Chantilly: Um… then why spend valuable Congressional time on this?

President Obama asked: “A victory for who? A victory for what?”

Lil Chantilly: This victory goes to the god given rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.

President Obama: (Regarding the Sandy Hook parents) “Isn’t their opinion relevant to this debate?”

Lil Chantilly: They have a first Amendment right to speak their mind, and my heart goes out to them. Their opinion, the opinion of Gabby Giffords, are all valid opinions. The millions of responsible gun owners also have valid opinions and a first amendment right to speak our minds. That is the beauty of our country, we can have a civil debate with two different passionate points of view. In the end our elected representatives listen to the opinions and facts presented to them and they vote. Today our representatives, our Senators did just that. The President said they voted against this Bill because they feared they would not be elected next time. I am not as educated as Mr. Obama, but if the constituents have written e-mails, made phone calls, and slammed social media with an overwhelming opinion communicating their displeasure with a Bill, so much so that a Senator worries he will not be elected if he goes against that flood of communication, isn’t that the point? Mr. Obama, they DID listen to us!

President Obama: All in all, this was a pretty shameful day for Washington.

Lil Chantilly: Somehow I do not think that George Washington or Thomas Jefferson would agree with you.

President Obama: “Even without Congress my Administration will keep doing everything it can.”

Lil Chantilly: I am sure you will, and when you step too far – there will be backlash.

President Obama did say quite a lot that I agree with 100% and I plan on taking his advice. I hope you do to:

President Obama’s closing remarks (summarized, not a direct quote:)

Law enforcement and responsible gun owners Democrats, Republicans, Urban moms, rural hunters, if your elected officials don’t act as you wish, come election time you must remember. From the NRA households, you need to contact the leadership and let them know if they represent your wishes! You outnumber those who argue the other way, you are better organized, and focus on this one issue [2nd Amendment] at election time. We, the American people, must sustain passion about this and must send the right people to Washington.

Yes, I know he was really speaking to the anti-gun crowd, but I KNOW those who actively support the 2nd Amendment out number those who actively support anti-gun legislation. We made our voices heard and the Senate proved that truth today.

In the words of John Paul Jones, an old Navy man, “We have not yet begun to fight!”

 

See which US Senators voted FOR increased gun laws today

Today I awoke to news that Senator Manchin believed he did not have the votes to pass the Toomey-Manchin Bill to extend background checks.  He was right! The Republicans who voted FOR these bills are highlighted in red.  The Amendments votes held today are listed below.

Amendment S. 715 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 54  Nay: 46

Purpose: To protect Second Amendment rights, ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, and provide a responsible and consistent background check process.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 6.21.55 PM

Amendment S. 719 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 57  Nay: 43

To allow reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 7.16.54 PM

Amendment S. 711 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 40  Nay: 60

To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 7.27.55 PM

Amendment S. 714 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 46  Nay: 54

Purpose: To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 7.35.35 PM

 

NASCAR and FOX are spineless

Screen Shot 2013-04-13 at 8.10.29 PMI have had a busy week, but I sat down to watch the NRA 500 at Texas Motor Speedway tonight. After all, if you read the “About me” on this blog, you know that I love NASCAR and I love my firearms! During the race I was talking to my fellow 2nd Amendment supporters on Facebook and Twitter – and one of them told me that NASCAR has decided to alienate their main fan base by suggesting they do not support the NRA Sponsorship of the Texas race tonight.  I looked it up and sure enough – ESPN had the story.

NASCAR plans to become more involved in race-sponsorship decisions by speedways in light of the continuing controversy surrounding the National Rifle Association’s sponsorship of the Sprint Cup race Saturday at Texas Motor Speedway.

“The NRA’s sponsorship of the event at Texas Motor Speedway fit within existing parameters that NASCAR affords tracks in securing partnerships,” said NASCAR spokesman David Higdon. “However, this situation has made it clear that we need to take a closer look at our approval process moving forward, as current circumstances need to be factored in when making decisions.”

Let’s try to keep all this in perspective, NASCAR Nation. Saturday’s NRA 500 at Texas Motor Speedway is just another Sprint Cup race — one that you likely won’t want to miss, writes David Newton.  In some respects, this weekend at TMS has become more about politics than racing for the NRA 500, as the sponsorship coincides with the current national gun control debate to become the prevailing storyline.

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut wrote to News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch asking the Fox network not broadcast Saturday night’s race because of the NRA sponsorship. TMS president Eddie Gossage and Speedway Motorsports Inc. chairman Bruton Smith answered questions regarding Murphy’s request and the NRA sponsorship Friday. Gossage said it would be the only time they would address the topic.  Read more here.

Screen Shot 2013-04-13 at 8.10.56 PMI watched the race, and NASCAR on Fox also decided to minimize the coverage.  The camera angles barely ever showed the giant painted logo at the start finish line, there was a mention here and there, but not like normal.  I also heard that the NRA did not “Purchase the TV package.”  Well, that may be true, but to avoid some of the painted logos, the camera men would have to be under specific orders to avoid showing them.

I am disappointed in FOX Sports, I am sick about NASCAR abandoning their fan base.  In the words of one of my favorite country songs, “You have to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything.”

There are still 7 laps to go.  I think I will turn it off.

Washington Post Editorial puts blame for gun violence on white men

Ace of Diamonds

Are these ladies playing the reverse gender-race card?

The following Op-Ed was written by twin sisters Charlotte and Harriet Childress and published in the Washington Post today. 

Imagine if African American men and boys were committing mass shootings month after month, year after year. Articles and interviews would flood the media, and we’d have political debates demanding that African Americans be “held accountable.” Then, if an atrocity such as the Newtown, Conn., shootings took place and African American male leaders held a news conference to offer solutions, their credibility would be questionable. The public would tell these leaders that they need to focus on problems in their own culture and communities. But when the criminals and leaders are white men, race and gender become the elephant in the room. Nearly all of the mass shootings in this country in recent years — not just Newtown, Aurora, Fort Hood, Tucson and Columbine — have been committed by white men and boys.

LIL CHANTILLY COMMENTARY: (Well, except Virginia Tech, committed by Seung-Hui Cho.)

Yet when the National Rifle Association (NRA), led by white men, held a news conference after the Newtown massacre to advise Americans on how to reduce gun violence, its leaders’ opinions were widely discussed. Unlike other groups, white men are not used to being singled out. So we expect that many of them will protest it is unfair if we talk about them. But our nation must correctly define their contribution to our problem of gun violence if it is to be solved. When white men try to divert attention from gun control by talking about mental health issues, many people buy into the idea that the United States has a national mental health problem, or flawed systems with which to address those problems, and they think that is what produces mass shootings. If life were equitable, white male gun-rights advocates would face some serious questions to assess their degree of credibility and objectivity. We would expect them to explain:

What facets of white male culture create so many mass shootings?

Why are so many white men and boys producing and entertaining themselves with violent video games and other media?

Why do white men buy, sell and manufacture guns for profit; attend gun shows; and demonstrate for unrestricted gun access disproportionately more than people of other ethnicities or races?

Why are white male congressmen leading the fight against gun control?

If Americans ask the right questions on gun issues, we will get the right answers. These answers will encourage white men to examine their role in their own culture and to help other white men and boys become healthier and less violent. Read more here.

————- End of Article ————-

LIL CHANTILLY COMMENTARY: Interesting, and presumptuous. While I agree that most (not all) of the mass shootings are young white men, this article failed to mention that most or all of the mass shooters have been on SSRI drugs for various mental conditions. They say violent video games part of the problem. Do ONLY white males play video games?  There are multiple stories of violence everyday. Rarely does this violence come in the form of a mass shooting. Beyond mass shootings, there is violence in many forms, caused by all races and sexes. In fact weapons besides guns are used quite often, and definitely MORE often than a rifle of any kind. While it is true, females tend to cause violence in different ways for different reasons than males – we cannot leave women out of the criminal category.

I went to Wikipedia and pulled a list of all rampage killers and I found that countries all over the world have this problem, and even in the USA, they are not ALL white.

These ladies are not helpful in the least and such an article only serves to polarize the issue, splintering it further. If you go to their website, it says between them, they have earned eight college degrees, including one Ph.D. and four master’s degrees. Perhaps they need to take another research class.  I would never use Wikipedia as a source on a professional paper, but I would allow it to clue me on to further research to find the truth in police reports and other factual documentation on my own. This is a very biased, one sided Op-Ed, certainly served up with an a la carte menu of biases to choose from.

We need to find ways to bring the country back together with education and working on solutions that will actually stop a mass shooter or a person intent on mass violence, period.

Mr. President: My conscience is clear

Screen Shot 2013-03-28 at 9.08.11 PMSpeaking of Audacity, today the president scolded Congress and the Nation saying, “Shame on us if we’ve forgotten, I haven’t forgotten those kids.”  Mr. President, I have not forgotten them either. Shame on you for assuming that supporting the 2nd Amendment and legal gun owners means our hearts don’t break for those babies and their families.  Shame on Congress for attempting to pass feel-good laws that will do nothing to prevent another spree killer, but instead punish every single gun owner in the country.  Shame on the media for supporting these meaningless bills and politicians.

My conscience is clear.

~Lil Chantilly

I can grieve for the victims of Newtown and continue to fight for our right to bear arms, they are not mutually exclusive. Mr. President, I have not forgotten those kids nor have I forgotten the constitution and the rights guaranteed in the fading ink.