Sadly, terrorists do not need GUNS to create terror

London (CNN) – A man thought to be a serving British soldier was killed by two armed men in a frenzied attack on a London street Wednesday, in what the government is treating as a suspected act of terrorism.

London terrorist

Witnesses told of a gruesome scene in which the man was hit by a car, then hacked with cleavers and his body dumped in the middle of the road in Woolwich, southeast London.  Go to CNN for more information.

Knowing that the evil exists, yet standing by doing nothing – or worse, removing the right of a person to protect themselves from evil, is evil incarnate. 

Mother – daughter time, girl time, Gun Style!

women-shooting-gunsLadies everywhere are breaking down stereotypes and taking the steps to learn how to protect themselves. In the article excerpt below, several ladies will inspire you with their positive energy and enjoyment of the sport of shooting, and the invaluable skill of self protection. These stories cannot be told too often, the main stream media forgets that female gun owners are a force to be reckoned with. We are here, we are growing in numbers, and we will not be told how to think as women. We are not weak. We are not afraid. We will do what it takes to care for ourselves and our families.

“It’s true,” Miller said. “It’s very true.”  They’re learning critical tactics, but also breaking down stereotypes and bolstering confidence.

“It’s overcoming something,” said Tracy Maalouf, a physician’s assistant and INPAX student. “Fear, you know women don’t touch guns. Only guys touch guns, so to get to that point where you’re not afraid of the gun.”

“Well, I carry concealed, so just knowing I can draw that gun if I need to and use it accurately and correctly,” said Joanne Herd, an administrative assistant.

“You know, it’s nice to know there’s other women who take the safety of their family as serious as I do,” said Sheri Teoli.

And it’s not just growing in popularity here in Pittsburgh, but across the region. The National Shooting Sports foundation says gun sales to women have grown nearly 73 percent in recent years.

Research shows tragic events often contribute to that, like the elementary school massacre in Newtown Connecticut.

“I think that the Sandy Hook event is what spurred a lot of this current trend,” said Sam Rosenberg with the INPAX Academy of Personal Protection. “We’ve seen such an increase in the desire and demand for security training for everyone, but a lot of women in particular.”

Sheri is so invested that she’s training to be an instructor.

“I think it’s important to be able to do it as a woman to make other women feel comfortable that they can come out and do this,” she said.

“The days of a woman being dependent on a man for protection is long gone,” Rosenberg said.  Read more here.

Democrats are shaking in their boots over Bloomberg’s Gun Control Ads

I am not sure how this country has become so partisan, the positive gun culture has been woven into the fabric of our nation, from the earliest colonial days. Certainly our nation has changed, grown, adapted as time has passed, but our love of guns and the passion for the 2nd Amendment is something that surpasses political lines. This fact is what concerns me the most about an article I read on Politico this morning:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s aides met recently with staffers of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to warn them: Targeting vulnerable Democrats like Arkansas’s Mark Pryor on gun control could backfire on the party, according to POLITICO. Apparently, Bloomberg did not listen. Ads from the Bloomberg-funded Mayors Against Illegal Guns are going up soon in Alaska, Arkansas and North Dakota — three states with Democratic senators who broke with the White House on last month’s background checks vote.  It’s all got Democrats nervous about keeping their hold on the Senate, if they are under attack from not only Republicans but pro-gun control forces as well.

Bloomberg’s group has made its choice: Its radio spots in Arkansas will target the state’s African-American community, “without which Mark Pryor doesn’t have a prayer of getting reelected,” said Mark Glaze, director of Mayors Against Illegal Guns. Four Senate Democrats — Pryor, Max Baucus of Montana, Mark Begich of Alaska and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota — joined with Republicans to derail the bill, drawing howls of protest from the gun control movement and complaints from the White House. But it’s Pryor’s fate that has Democratic leadership most worried.

Senate Democrats point to the example of former Arkansas Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln as a warning. Labor unions, angered by Lincoln’s vote against legislation they backed, helped fund a primary challenger in 2010. Lincoln narrowly won that primary, and then was swamped that November by Republican John Boozman. Democratic senators and aides also note that Pryor has backed President Barack Obama and the leadership on other big issues such as Obamacare, banking reform and taxes, and Reid will need him on upcoming immigration votes.  

I have seen both sides of the aisle hold their ground so firmly even to their detriment. I do not understand why the Democratic party is willing to spend so much political capital on this issue and these laws when they have so many other items they would like to accomplish on their agenda. Why they are so set on these Bills when it is obvious they are “feel good laws” at best, tyranny at the worst, and will do nothing to stop evil with intent on harming others.

Why would they take on their own party’s Senators when their hold on Congress is not as strong as they desire?  They admit that Senator Pryor has supported many other major items on the Obama agenda, but Sen. Pryor felt like he was voting the way his constituents would want him to vote.  If every member of congress had done so – we would not even be having this conversation. For example, if the Senators in Colorado had made their votes based on the wishes of the people of Colorado, the mail, the e-mails, the phone calls, they would not have voted for this Bill either. In our Representative Republic, we the people elected the individuals who we most trusted would govern in a way aligned with our values.  I am sure the people of Arkansas made the decision to vote for Sen. Pryor because they feel he represents their interests.

I think that’s one thing the American people are frustrated about, these purity tests. Quite honestly, I’m here to represent Arkansas. I think people on all sides, in all parties and all groups, they need to go back to civics class and maybe read the Constitution and realize we’re here to represent our states and the people who sent us to Washington. 

~Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR)

There is something very disturbing about one Billionaire, from one state, messing with the political will of the people in another state.  It is time we take our country back.

Here are the results of Intimidator and Head Hunter at Thunder Valley Precision!

Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 11.55.47 AMThunder Valley Precision is a shooters paradise! Tom Sarver is the owner and operator. His range is simply spectacular, honestly – I have never seen anything like it. I did participate in two events, the Intimidator match on Saturday and the Head Hunter and Short Course combo on Sunday. It was the first time I had ever participated in a firearms match of any type, and I was nervous and excited in the days leading up to it. Luckily, I have a couple of great friends who are mentoring me, and I was in good hands.

Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 11.53.51 AM

I read as much as possible about the matches before hand, and asked Don and Bill a million questions in the days leading up to the match. Over the last two years, I have been training with them about once every two months (as we live in different states) and using simulators like “Shooter Ready” to practice dialing elevation and wind into my scope. Eventually, Don invited me to come to TVP, so I could take a step toward my goal of competing legitimately in long range competitions. In order to start improving in proficiency, this weekend was invaluable to see how the really good teams like Peter & John or Bill & Don communicated with each other, how they called corrections, and the steps they took before hand to prepare for each stage. When I practice with Bill and Don at their farm, it is very calm and enjoyable – but they always say I need to increase my speed, that I need to learn that I can hit a target even if everything is not just perfect. When I am at the farm though, I had no real incentive to increase my speed – only to ensure I hit the target every single time, in other words, perfection. After this weekend, with timed stages, I realized how long I was really taking and discovered about a hundred steps in the process where I could shave time. Everyone was really nice, and understood this was my first time ever shooting in a match. It was clear that I was a complete novice – so I know they basically ignored the time clock when I was shooting. I promise that I will be faster next time! I cannot say enough about how kind everyone was – and I sincerely appreciated it!

If you have never participated in a match like this before, I’ll take you though the process from my perspective and all the things I learned. I share this information, because I think that sometimes people, especially ladies, might be interested in doing something like this but may never take the step because of the unknown.

Preparation prior to the match

I was using Bill’s rifle, so he did most (all) of the prep work for this match. He did take time to talk to me about the steps he had taken to prepare. The target ranges were posted for these matches on the TVP website, but Bill and Don had data sheet in a dope book made by TVP specifically for the event.

The night before, we all opened our favorite ballistic calculator apps on our smartphones and entered the data for the load of the rounds we were using.  We entered data like the bullet weight and type, feet per second (fps), barrel twist, type of powder, amount of powder, etc. (I’ll share info on my favorite ballistic iPhone app in a separate blog post.)

After all that data was entered, we only had to tap a button, and the app automatically produced a range card with suggested elevation come-ups. These apps also give you a precise calculated come up if you enter the exact range for each target. So, we went through the known ranges for this match and entered the come ups for Bill’s rifle in the space beside each target.  Because they have shot this course before, they already had data for most of the targets. There is another space on the data card to enter any corrections the shooter had to make while shooting to hit the target, which increased accuracy throughout the day and for use in future events.  (These apps only get you so close, but they may not be perfect.) Once our range card was completely filled out to our satisfaction, we were able to relax, and got a good night of sleep. (Although I was like a kid at Christmas and sleep came slow…)

Day one – Intimidator (four stages/four targets)

We got to TVP around 8:00am on Saturday morning, we were the first people there. The match started at 10:00am, but Tom opens the range at 8:00am to zero scopes and warm-up, etc.  Around 8:30am or so other people started showing up and we chatted with different folks. Don and Bill found John, Peter, and their friend Scott who they had met at other matches – what super guys, intelligent, funny, and kind. Listening to them discuss this sport we all love is like being an audience to a Ph.D level discussion on firearms.

I was using Bill’s 284 Custom Remington for this match, since my 6XC is not going to be ready for a while.

284 my favorite rifle ever, that is until my 6XC is ready!

This 284 is my favorite rifle ever, that is until my 6XC is ready!

Bill checked his rifle and his zero. Then he took a few shots to check his dope and let me do the same. This .284 is the reason I HAD to get a custom rifle myself, after shooting Bill’s rifle a couple years ago, I have never found one that I love more than his baby. I am sure that my 6XC will eventually take the place, as it will be mine and made to fit me perfectly. In the meantime, I am thankful that Bill is kind enough to share!

The entire group headed up to the first stage of intimidator. Since Bill and Don were a team, Tom assigned me with two other shooters who did not have teammates, Scott and Kurt. I think that Scott had taken on this course once before and Kurt definitely had more experience than both of us. I was set up to shoot first, followed by Scott, then Kurt. By the end of the day I was able to spot their shots and tried to make wind calls for them, but at the beginning of the day it was all I could do to remember all the things I needed to do. So, I would like to take this moment to thank them both for being so patient!

Screen Shot 2013-05-05 at 10.41.32 AM

My teammates and I for the intimidator course

From my perspective, here is the process I came to learn after taking on target after target:

  1. Dial your dope for the first target while you are waiting for other’s to shoot (assuming you know the range, which we did.)
  2. When your turn comes, place your rifle down pointed toward the target, flip up the scope cover as required. (If it obvious your bipod needs adjusted, do that immediately.)
  3. Get down behind the rifle, and acquire the target. I “may” have gotten addicted to zooming to the highest power to make my shots, so I had to zoom out to find the target (usually).  Don encouraged me to find a mid range power level and stick to it, as he said I it would cut time in acquiring the target, not to mention – he said I would be able to hit the target just fine even if the target didn’t fill my ENTIRE reticle.  **smile**  I am going to have to work on that one. Toward the end of the second day, I discovered he was right, but I am going to have to practice like that for a while. Someone, maybe John said, “Small power, small error, increased power, increased error,” or something to that effect.
  4. Make a decision if you need to hold wind, this might be based on wind flags, your spotters call, from watching previous shooters, etc.
  5. If you are the first shooter, take your shot and hit!  Or…
  6. Listen for a correction from your spotter, this might be “Hold 1 tenth Left” or “hold 3 o’clock on the target” or “one tenth high” or “no call”.
  7. If you are the 2nd shooter, the 1st shooter will tell you what wind they held when they hit, use this information to aim.

Note: I learned that the first shooter frequently gets a lower score than the second shooter, because they are the one figuring out the actual wind hold, etc.   The 2nd shooter’s hit rate will be higher if they quickly follow with their own shot. I noticed with both Bill & Don as well as with Peter & John, that they were both ready to actually shoot the target and when one hit, he gave a quick wind call and the other quickly followed and would hit in most cases.

After the first stage of four targets, my neck muscles were sore. I realized I had tensed all my muscles so tight, that I felt it all the way to stage two.  The first was the worst, I did relax after that – a little.

Intimidator has 16 total 12″x12″ steel targets divided among four stages.  You can see the stages and distances along the top of the score sheet in the photo below.

Results at the end of the day: Congratulations to Peter and John, they won the team competition!

My favorite stage was #2, I actually hit every one of those targets on the first hit!  (Although, remember – if a 2nd shooter does better than the 1st, I was really like a 3rd shooter.  Don was calling wind for Bill, Bill was annotating corrections, and I was using Bill’s rifle and his data book.)  Did I mention that Bill also kept me from making stupid mistakes, in spite of my occasional protests…  (Thanks Bill!)

Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 12.44.15 PM

Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 9.51.46 PM

Day Two – Head Hunter (four stages, five targets each)/Short Course Combo (five stages, four targets each)

The second day was a mixed combo of Head Hunters (HH) and Short Course (SC). The HH is made of 20 6″ x 9″ head shaped steel targets, all under 600 yards, and about half in the 300-400-ish range. For HH, you only get one shot at each target, One Shot – One Kill.  The Short Course was the same as Intimidator, with closer targets – you got three chances to make corrections and hit the target. I think all the targets were around 500 yards and closer, they were 12″ x 12″ steel targets. I would like to bring my very accurate Remington 5R .223 (trued by gunsmith Mark Penrod with a Jewel trigger and an Accuracy International Stock) with me to try the short course, it would be a hoot! I think the SC had five stages of four targets each, but if I am wrong, I welcome the correction.

We showed up at the range on Sunday morning to very steady, persistent rainfall.  It was a pleasant temperature, maybe 55 or 60 degrees, but the rain only let up a few times throughout the day.  We had good rain gear, and felt dry – but, the rain brought different challenges.  Everyone had soaking wet data cards. Bill had an arm band with a plastic window where we placed smaller range cards we made for HH.

Don was my teammate for the second day. We shot the first stage of the SC first. We didn’t really know we were going to shoot the short course, we thought it was only HH, so we had not preplanned all our come-ups for the SC.  Tom gave us all the distances for the stage a few minutes before the group got started, and Bill had his ballistic app open and I was writing elevations as fast as we could go. I was still using Bill’s rifle, so when he found out that we also had three shots at the SC targets, he started to get a little worried about ammo to cover the day for both of us on both courses. So he just told me, “You had better hit on the first shot!.” (Luckily my second day was much better than the first day.)

Screen Shot 2013-05-05 at 8.48.36 AMSince we had not known the ranges for the SC until about three minutes before we shot, we made a quick range card for them, but ended up just scribbling the come-ups on our hands so we didn’t soak the paper. Hey, I am sure if are reading this, you want to hear about the good the bad and the ugly.  Shooting in the rain was not an issue, other than we were sharing mats, and especially during the 1st stage of HH, had to take great care not to get mud everywhere!  Because it was a dark day, it may have made seeing the targets even easier, and the rain showed the direction of the wind.  (Although Tom has several wind flags at key points on his range.) I am going to blame the rain and how cold my hands were on a couple of other mistakes I made – and leave it at that.

Over all, the short course was fun – I missed the closest target and maybe one other one completely the whole day – and I hit most of them on the first hit.  We were not keeping score, on that one, so this is my story, and I am telling the one that Don and Bill think is true. Ha! I was using a great rifle, the targets were closer, and by Sunday I had lots of practice!  Most of the people had fun with the SC.  Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 9.51.30 PMPeter and John used some of these targets to practice with their shooting sticks, Don used a stage to try his sling, there was a gentleman out there with his .223, it was a laid back fun day. There was even one stage that we had to shoot with a log supporting the rifle. I had never done that before, but it was that moment where I felt something click, where I “knew” I had no choice but to pull the trigger when it was “good enough” and not perfect.  I kept hearing Bill say “Hit” when I was shooting off the log, and my confidence when up a lot. I guess moments like this were the whole point of the weekend.

HH was a blast, I want to go do that again! The last stage is ridiculous! Check out the scores below, only a couple of targets were any further than the others had been all day, but there were very few hits that stage from anyone.  The position we were shooting from was across a gully, and the targets were at various elevations scattered on a hillside across the gully. The wind was hard to read and when you corrected for what you thought the wind was doing on that stage, it was (more often than not) wrong.

Results at the end of the day:

We did not write down the short course scores, and due to the pouring rain, it is a miracle the Head Hunters score sheet survived! Here are the Head Hunter Scores for April 28, 2013: Congratulations to Bill for connecting with the most heads all day!

Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 12.44.52 PM

Overall this was a great experience.  I mainly learned how far I still have to go to really feel like I know what I am doing in this sport. Still, I can not thank Bill and Don enough for teaching me and getting me this far. For the rest of you out there who want to try something like this, Thunder Valley Precision is a great place to shoot. The people were nice, Tom has an amazing range, and everyone is glad to chat and answer questions. Nothing but fun!

Long story short, I cannot wait to do it again!

NRA Women – This is OUR Time!

Screen Shot 2013-05-03 at 8.12.29 PM

This video titled “New Energy” is one of the most powerful, beautiful, and explanatory pieces of work I have seen representing women who celebrate the 2nd Amendment.  I am a female gun enthusiast, and see myself in this video.  This is who I am. This is who most gun owners are.  If you have not yet seen it, take a few minutes and share it with some one who is not too sure – maybe it will help them understand.

I’m entering my 1st long range competition!

IntimidatorI have been writing this blog for nearly two years. When I started, I had mainly been exposed to various handguns, thus the name of my blog. Shortly after I began heelsandhandguns.com, I was bitten by the long range bug in a serious way.  If you have been following my progress, you have seen a video of the first time I ever even pulled the trigger on an Accuracy International .308, through experiences out on the range as I learned more each time, through the design and decisions I made for my own long range tactical rifle.

$$$, my rifle mentor, invited me to go with them to my first competition! I am not ready to seriously believe I am going to actually “be” competition for anyone else.  I am going to get the feel of a competition and to see how other teams communicate, what it feels like to be on the clock, to see what I know now and the long list of things I still need to learn.  I think that after this weekend, I will be able to put a lot of things in perspective.  We usually shoot at a farm where I can take all day to dial the scope, acquire the target, ensure I am holding my wind at exactly .7432 mil (ha ha – just kidding), get my breathing right, listen to my spotter tell me to “send it” for the 47th time in the last 12 minutes I have taken to get everything right.  This is going to be a lot different than that, and I am sure that this weekend will exponentially increase my knowledge.

We are going to be shooting at Thunder Valley Precision in Ohio.  One day is “Head Hunter” and one day is “Intimidator”.   I listed the positions and targets from other years below:

Head Hunter Day

  • Pos 1) 342,370,403,526,566
  • Pos 2) 360,349,329,512,521
  • Pos 3) 330,373,418,435,440
  • Pos 4) 423,514,557,600,560

Intimidator

  • Pos 1) 563,950,1165,938, Bonus 1650
  • Pos 2) 552,892,674,795
  • Pos 3) 276,366,587,1048
  • Pos 4) 570,499,704,586

Speaking of “intimidator“, I am really excited to do this, but honestly I am also quite intimidated!  I have not ever entered any firearm competition, but I have to start somewhere.  This is going to be a big adventure, and I will let you know how it goes – the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Here is an example of one of the positions on the Intimidator course.

Here is an example of one of the positions on the Intimidator course.

LA Times hides gun control commentary in an article about the Boston Terrorists buying snacks

 Screen Shot 2013-04-22 at 4.55.49 PM

Last night as I read through news, I came across an article from the Los Angeles Times with the Headline:

“Police: Boston bombing suspects lost hostage while buying snacks”

I’ll admit I was mildly interested, as the headline promised an angle with potentially different information (in the dumb criminal realm) from that recycled over and over on cable news. I clicked on it expecting to read something regarding the carjacking incident that eventually led to the police shootout and the death of Tamerlan Tsarnaev.  

Then, like a booby trap, I ran SMACK into the first two paragraphs of the article talking about the gun laws these terrorists were breaking:

The two suspects in last weeks Boston Marathon bombing weren’t licensed to have guns, the Cambridge, Mass., Police Department confirmed Sunday. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, who was captured after a gun battle with police Friday, wasnt old enough to be licensed to own a gun in Massachusetts. The minimum legal age is 21. His older brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, who was fatally wounded hours earlier, never had a license to own or carry a gun in Cambridge, where the pair shared an apartment, Cambridge Police spokesman Dan Riviello told the Los Angeles Times. Its unclear whether he ever applied for a license.

This is exactly how it is going to be from now on, the gun agenda weaved into every issue, as commentary on any crime. What does the quoted paragraph have to do with the headline?  If someone is willing to build bombs and kill innocent people at a positive energy event like a marathon, why do we think they would comply with gun laws?  Why even mention it?

Yes they had guns, and in spite of Massachusetts gun laws in place, they apparently were in possession of them anyway.

This is one of the most poorly written articles by a large newspaper I have ever read.  Even if I disagree with other articles, I rarely call them poorly written.  This article must have initially had a different headline and then changed it for some reason without changing anything about the outline of the article. I don’t know about you, but the fact that evil men broke gun laws does not shock me.  It just backs up the theory of all law-abiding gun owners that gun laws, including those already in place, will not stop evil.

The stark contrast of good vs. evil

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 10.01.13 PMBack in June 2005 I ran in, and finished, the Rock and Roll Marathon in San Diego, CA.  I still remember the day 18 months, or so, earlier when a couple of my friends in the Navy suggested I train to run a half marathon. I did begin training, and competed in longer and longer events, a 5K, a 10K, a 15K, and then I ran every single half marathon in San Diego the year prior to the actual Marathon I finished.  Every weekend I mapped out a long run, I planned the logistics, the drinks, required electrolytes, my safety, childcare for my daughter, and then I would run.  I still remember the complete peace, the tranquility, the joy of those mornings out in the sun, out in my community, pushing my body to increased endurance with every additional mile.  It was complete joy.

After a few races, there were two things that surprised me:

1.  I loved running and with a proper training plan, I really felt I had the capability to try for a full 26.2 mile Marathon.

2. I discovered that the atmosphere and the energy that flowed from these races was among the most positive I had ever experienced.  No one was angry. People were focused, serious, silly, laughing, happy, sucking on oranges, drinking water, tying their shoes in just the right way, talking, stretching, warming up, encouraging, helpful, smearing sunscreen, colorful, and excited.

I was hooked. This energy I found emanated from the crowd in race after race after race. People who do not run wonder why anyone would voluntarily run long distances, and I can tell you that once you experience the euphoria – you will want to feel it again and again.

I tell you this story because I must contrast it with the evil that rained down on the Boston Marathon on Monday.  There are so many stories that have come and will continue to come from that day – both heartbreaking and inspirational. I can tell you that anyone who decides to run a marathon does so for very personal reasons.  Those who decided to plan, take the time to train, and then actually made the distance are some of the most resilient, determined people on this planet. Their friends and families cheering for them on the sidelines had supported them through a long process and now were waiting to share in the moment of victory.  I had my daughter’s name on my bib and the last .2 miles, I was looking for her, waiting to see her, I knew she was there.

I cannot imagine if I had been close to finishing when a terrorist bombed the race, knowing my family was up there waiting for me to finish.  It is so far from what that moment is supposed to be, what the entire day represents, from the pure goodness of long distance runners and the positive atmosphere.

I just wanted to take a moment to recognize the joy that a marathon should bring, and to mourn the loss of three beautifully innocent people. I need to say a prayer for the dozens of people whose bodies will never be the same, that their spirit might grow exponentially stronger. A prayer that the inevitable fear hiding in the dark might soften over time and be replaced by resilience so strong that and love so deep that the fear has no where to grow. A prayer for the city of Boston, you have been an example for all since the birth of our country, and you are a perfect symbol of all that is America yet today. A prayer for our country, the United States of America – whether this came from within or from an international threat, we will not fear, we will live, we will thrive. When you finish a marathon, as you cross the finish line, you will never feel more ALIVE.

Alive.  Yes, that is the feeling of a marathon.  Alive. Terrorism cannot take that away.

I am going to do EXACTLY what you said Mr. President!

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 8.52.48 PM

Today President Obama responded to the defeat of the Toomey-Manchin Bill. He was quite emotional, angry, and showered veiled threats on the Democrats who chose to side with the Constitution. He was surrounded by Sandy Hook parents and Gabby Giffords. Watch the video below of President Obama, and then let’s discuss some of the points he makes in the video:

President Obama: A few moments ago a minority in the United States Senate decided it just wasn’t worth it. They blocked common sense gun reforms.

Lil Chantilly: If the Senate had the required 60 votes they would have passed. You are an Ivy League educated scholar Mr. President, surely you know that it only required 41 votes to shoot down these amendments. There is a reason our system is set up as it is.

President Obama: It wouldn’t have prevented future massacres.

Lil Chantilly: Um… then why spend valuable Congressional time on this?

President Obama asked: “A victory for who? A victory for what?”

Lil Chantilly: This victory goes to the god given rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.

President Obama: (Regarding the Sandy Hook parents) “Isn’t their opinion relevant to this debate?”

Lil Chantilly: They have a first Amendment right to speak their mind, and my heart goes out to them. Their opinion, the opinion of Gabby Giffords, are all valid opinions. The millions of responsible gun owners also have valid opinions and a first amendment right to speak our minds. That is the beauty of our country, we can have a civil debate with two different passionate points of view. In the end our elected representatives listen to the opinions and facts presented to them and they vote. Today our representatives, our Senators did just that. The President said they voted against this Bill because they feared they would not be elected next time. I am not as educated as Mr. Obama, but if the constituents have written e-mails, made phone calls, and slammed social media with an overwhelming opinion communicating their displeasure with a Bill, so much so that a Senator worries he will not be elected if he goes against that flood of communication, isn’t that the point? Mr. Obama, they DID listen to us!

President Obama: All in all, this was a pretty shameful day for Washington.

Lil Chantilly: Somehow I do not think that George Washington or Thomas Jefferson would agree with you.

President Obama: “Even without Congress my Administration will keep doing everything it can.”

Lil Chantilly: I am sure you will, and when you step too far – there will be backlash.

President Obama did say quite a lot that I agree with 100% and I plan on taking his advice. I hope you do to:

President Obama’s closing remarks (summarized, not a direct quote:)

Law enforcement and responsible gun owners Democrats, Republicans, Urban moms, rural hunters, if your elected officials don’t act as you wish, come election time you must remember. From the NRA households, you need to contact the leadership and let them know if they represent your wishes! You outnumber those who argue the other way, you are better organized, and focus on this one issue [2nd Amendment] at election time. We, the American people, must sustain passion about this and must send the right people to Washington.

Yes, I know he was really speaking to the anti-gun crowd, but I KNOW those who actively support the 2nd Amendment out number those who actively support anti-gun legislation. We made our voices heard and the Senate proved that truth today.

In the words of John Paul Jones, an old Navy man, “We have not yet begun to fight!”

 

See which US Senators voted FOR increased gun laws today

Today I awoke to news that Senator Manchin believed he did not have the votes to pass the Toomey-Manchin Bill to extend background checks.  He was right! The Republicans who voted FOR these bills are highlighted in red.  The Amendments votes held today are listed below.

Amendment S. 715 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 54  Nay: 46

Purpose: To protect Second Amendment rights, ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, and provide a responsible and consistent background check process.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 6.21.55 PM

Amendment S. 719 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 57  Nay: 43

To allow reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 7.16.54 PM

Amendment S. 711 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 40  Nay: 60

To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 7.27.55 PM

Amendment S. 714 to Senate Bill S.649: Yea 46  Nay: 54

Purpose: To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

Screen Shot 2013-04-17 at 7.35.35 PM